Even if the Restaurant Association releases the contents of complaints in response to complainant's request, it is a he said, she said thing until the case goes to court where evidences and defense will play out. The latest we heard, the accuser does not want to proceed with this incidence.
With all that has been said in the media, the readers can make up their own mind.
So what does O'Donnell want to accomplish?
The ill intent to expose the current NRA CEO ( insisting on showing her picture ) to an out of control OWS crowd is unbecoming of a professional journalist. She is an employee who has to follow the company's legal counsel. O'Donnell may well subject her to danger, surely he is making her life miserable.
I call his action an incitement of malice.